Naoero vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate

Naoero
-0.5245 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Tanzania, United Republic of
-0.5354 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Naoero rank
138th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
141st

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time

  • Naoero
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
-1-0.8-0.6-0.4199620102024

How they compare

Naoero currently reports -0.5245 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5354 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.0109 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Naoero ranks 138th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 141st of 204 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Naoero averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Naoero Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s -0.7384 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4235 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3149 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s -0.6517 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.494 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1577 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s -0.4323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6274 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.195 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Naoero

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Naoero or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Naoero, at -0.5245 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5354 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2024.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Naoero and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0109 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and Tanzania, United Republic of?
18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
How do Naoero and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Naoero ranks 138th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 141st of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Naoero vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/naoero/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/naoero/tanzania/">Naoero vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,143 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.