Montenegro vs Rwanda: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Montenegro
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.2546 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2093 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.0453 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 79th and Rwanda ranks 76th of 206 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.1086 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3801 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 0.1836 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0013 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1822 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 0.2554 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1872 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0681 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Montenegro or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 0.2546 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2093 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Montenegro as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Montenegro and Rwanda?
- 0.0453 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Rwanda?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Montenegro and Rwanda rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Montenegro ranks 79th and Rwanda ranks 76th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.