Montenegro vs Namibia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Montenegro
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0.1349 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1273 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.0076 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Namibia ahead.
Montenegro ranks 81st and Namibia ranks 79th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.1248 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2286 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3534 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0.1673 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1418 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0255 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 0.2102 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1059 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1044 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Montenegro or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 0.1349 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1273 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Montenegro and Namibia?
- 0.0076 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Namibia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Montenegro and Namibia rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Montenegro ranks 81st and Namibia ranks 79th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.