Mongolia vs South Africa: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Mongolia
- South Africa
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports -0.0493 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0682 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in South Africa, a difference of 0.0189 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was South Africa ahead.
Mongolia ranks 97th and South Africa ranks 99th of 206 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.4125 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3371 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7495 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | South Africa |
| 2000s | -0.1718 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8261 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | South Africa |
| 2010s | -0.2104 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4094 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6198 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | South Africa |
| 2020s | -0.0746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0072 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0675 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Mongolia or South Africa?
- Mongolia, at -0.0493 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0682 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in South Africa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Mongolia and South Africa?
- 0.0189 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and South Africa?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Mongolia and South Africa rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Mongolia ranks 97th and South Africa ranks 99th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.