Mongolia vs Samoa: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Mongolia
- Samoa
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports -0.0493 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Samoa, a difference of 0.0263 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Samoa ahead.
Mongolia ranks 97th and Samoa ranks 100th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.4125 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1066 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.519 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Samoa |
| 2000s | -0.1718 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0493 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2212 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Samoa |
| 2010s | -0.2104 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0152 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1952 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Samoa |
| 2020s | -0.0746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1496 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.075 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Mongolia or Samoa?
- Mongolia, at -0.0493 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Samoa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Mongolia and Samoa?
- 0.0263 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Samoa?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Mongolia and Samoa rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Mongolia ranks 97th and Samoa ranks 100th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.