Monaco vs United Arab Emirates: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Monaco
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Monaco, a difference of 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Monaco ahead.
Monaco ranks 30th and United Arab Emirates ranks 28th of 204 countries.
Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Monaco | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2265 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Monaco |
| 2020s | 1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2095 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Monaco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Monaco or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Monaco as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Monaco and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and United Arab Emirates?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Monaco and United Arab Emirates rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Monaco ranks 30th and United Arab Emirates ranks 28th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.