Moldova vs Mongolia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Moldova
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports -0.0493 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0529 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Moldova, a difference of 0.0036 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Moldova ahead.
Moldova ranks 98th and Mongolia ranks 97th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Moldova averaged higher in 3 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.2737 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4125 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1387 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Moldova |
| 2000s | -0.4522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1718 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2804 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | -0.1664 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2104 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.044 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Moldova |
| 2020s | -0.0498 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0248 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Moldova or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at -0.0493 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0529 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Moldova as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Moldova and Mongolia?
- 0.0036 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Mongolia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Moldova and Mongolia rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Moldova ranks 98th and Mongolia ranks 97th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.