Moldova vs Mongolia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Moldova
- Mongolia
How they compare
Moldova currently reports -0.0467 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0707 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.024 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Moldova ahead.
Moldova ranks 96th and Mongolia ranks 98th of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Moldova averaged higher in 3 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.319 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4211 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1021 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Moldova |
| 2000s | -0.4836 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1951 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2885 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | -0.1903 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2159 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0255 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Moldova |
| 2020s | -0.0766 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0372 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Moldova or Mongolia?
- Moldova, at -0.0467 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0707 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mongolia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Moldova and Mongolia?
- 0.024 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Mongolia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Moldova and Mongolia rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Moldova ranks 96th and Mongolia ranks 98th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.