Mexico vs Tonga: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Mexico
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports -0.1945 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1958 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mexico, a difference of 0.0013 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 110th and Tonga ranks 109th of 204 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.3583 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7009 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mexico |
| 2010s | 0.1533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3182 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4714 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mexico |
| 2020s | -0.1678 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2736 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1058 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Mexico or Tonga?
- Tonga, at -0.1945 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1958 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mexico as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Mexico and Tonga?
- 0.0013 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Tonga?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Mexico and Tonga rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Mexico ranks 110th and Tonga ranks 109th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.