Mexico vs Tonga: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Mexico
- Tonga
How they compare
Mexico currently reports -0.2337 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2553 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tonga, a difference of 0.0216 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 116th and Tonga ranks 117th of 206 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4054 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mexico |
| 2010s | 0.2105 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3496 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mexico |
| 2020s | -0.1256 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.297 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1715 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Mexico or Tonga?
- Mexico, at -0.2337 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2553 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tonga as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Mexico and Tonga?
- 0.0216 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Tonga?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
- How do Mexico and Tonga rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Mexico ranks 116th and Tonga ranks 117th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.