Marshall Islands vs Mauritania: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Marshall Islands
-0.7313 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Mauritania
-0.7227 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Marshall Islands rank
157th
Mauritania rank
154th

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Marshall Islands
  • Mauritania
-1-0.500.5199620102025

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports -0.7227 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7313 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.0086 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mauritania ahead.

Marshall Islands ranks 157th and Mauritania ranks 154th of 206 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Marshall Islands Mauritania Difference Ahead
2000s -0.8488 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5404 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2010s -0.9345 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6753 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2592 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2020s -0.8464 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0111 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Marshall Islands or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at -0.7227 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7313 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Marshall Islands as of 2025.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Marshall Islands and Mauritania?
0.0086 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Mauritania?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Marshall Islands and Mauritania rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Marshall Islands ranks 157th and Mauritania ranks 154th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Marshall Islands vs Mauritania: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/marshall-islands/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/marshall-islands/mauritania/">Marshall Islands vs Mauritania: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,391 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.