Malaysia vs Slovenia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Malaysia
- Slovenia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 0.6842 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6605 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0237 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Slovenia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 44th and Slovenia ranks 47th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4077 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7773 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3696 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 0.5419 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8761 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3342 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 0.7449 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7288 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0161 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 0.6701 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7694 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0993 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Malaysia or Slovenia?
- Malaysia, at 0.6842 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6605 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Slovenia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Malaysia and Slovenia?
- 0.0237 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Slovenia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Malaysia and Slovenia rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Malaysia ranks 44th and Slovenia ranks 47th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.