Malaysia vs Poland: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Malaysia
0.6842 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Poland
0.7887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Malaysia rank
44th
Poland rank
42nd

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Malaysia
  • Poland
00.20.40.60.81199620102025

How they compare

Poland currently reports 0.7887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6842 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.1045 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 44th and Poland ranks 42nd of 206 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Poland Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4077 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5379 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1302 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Poland
2000s 0.5419 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7738 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2319 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Poland
2010s 0.7449 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8461 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1012 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Poland
2020s 0.6701 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7326 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0625 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Malaysia or Poland?
Poland, at 0.7887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6842 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malaysia as of 2025.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Malaysia and Poland?
0.1045 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Poland?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Malaysia and Poland rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Malaysia ranks 44th and Poland ranks 42nd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Poland: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/malaysia/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/malaysia/poland/">Malaysia vs Poland: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,391 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.