Malaysia vs Poland: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Malaysia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0.6858 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6805 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.0053 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 48th and Poland ranks 47th of 204 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4261 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4354 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0093 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Poland |
| 2000s | 0.5942 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7185 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1243 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Poland |
| 2010s | 0.7422 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8321 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0899 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Poland |
| 2020s | 0.6584 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6915 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0331 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Malaysia or Poland?
- Poland, at 0.6858 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6805 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malaysia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Malaysia and Poland?
- 0.0053 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Poland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Malaysia and Poland rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Malaysia ranks 48th and Poland ranks 47th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.