Madagascar vs East Timor: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Madagascar
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports -0.7342 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.0144 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Madagascar ahead.
Madagascar ranks 156th and East Timor ranks 155th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 2 and East Timor in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.441 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8256 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | -0.822 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Madagascar |
| 2020s | -0.834 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8179 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0161 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Madagascar or East Timor?
- East Timor, at -0.7342 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Madagascar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Madagascar and East Timor?
- 0.0144 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and East Timor?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Madagascar and East Timor rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Madagascar ranks 156th and East Timor ranks 155th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.