Madagascar vs Tajikistan: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate

Madagascar
-0.7486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Tajikistan
-0.7588 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Madagascar rank
156th
Tajikistan rank
158th

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time

  • Madagascar
  • Tajikistan
-2-1.5-1-0.5199620102024

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports -0.7486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7588 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.0102 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Madagascar ahead.

Madagascar ranks 156th and Tajikistan ranks 158th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 3 and Tajikistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1990s -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.82 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7916 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Madagascar
2000s -0.4514 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7139 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Madagascar
2010s -0.822 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.9084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0864 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Madagascar
2020s -0.834 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0155 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Madagascar or Tajikistan?
Madagascar, at -0.7486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7588 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tajikistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Madagascar and Tajikistan?
0.0102 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Tajikistan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Madagascar and Tajikistan rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Madagascar ranks 156th and Tajikistan ranks 158th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Tajikistan: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/madagascar/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/madagascar/tajikistan/">Madagascar vs Tajikistan: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,143 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.