Kosovo vs Tonga: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Kosovo
- Tonga
How they compare
Kosovo currently reports -0.2229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2553 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tonga, a difference of 0.0324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Kosovo ahead.
Kosovo ranks 115th and Tonga ranks 117th of 206 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kosovo averaged higher in 2 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.278 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6704 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3923 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kosovo |
| 2010s | -0.2886 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3496 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.061 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kosovo |
| 2020s | -0.3691 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3054 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0637 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Kosovo or Tonga?
- Kosovo, at -0.2229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2553 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tonga as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Kosovo and Tonga?
- 0.0324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kosovo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Tonga?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Kosovo and Tonga rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Kosovo ranks 115th and Tonga ranks 117th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.