Kosovo vs Mexico: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Kosovo
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports -0.1958 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kosovo, a difference of 0.0271 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Kosovo ranks 113th and Mexico ranks 110th of 204 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.278 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3433 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6213 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mexico |
| 2010s | -0.2886 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4418 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mexico |
| 2020s | -0.3691 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1678 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2013 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Kosovo or Mexico?
- Mexico, at -0.1958 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kosovo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Kosovo and Mexico?
- 0.0271 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Mexico?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Kosovo and Mexico rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Kosovo ranks 113th and Mexico ranks 110th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.