Kosovo vs Maldives: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Kosovo
- Maldives
How they compare
Kosovo currently reports -0.2229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2354 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Maldives, a difference of 0.0125 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Maldives ahead.
Kosovo ranks 113th and Maldives ranks 115th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kosovo averaged higher in 1 and Maldives in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.278 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2792 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0012 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kosovo |
| 2010s | -0.2886 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2426 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0459 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Maldives |
| 2020s | -0.3691 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3098 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0593 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Kosovo or Maldives?
- Kosovo, at -0.2229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2354 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Maldives as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Kosovo and Maldives?
- 0.0125 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kosovo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Maldives?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Kosovo and Maldives rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Kosovo ranks 113th and Maldives ranks 115th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.