Japan vs Lithuania: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Japan
- Lithuania
How they compare
Japan currently reports 1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Lithuania ahead.
Japan ranks 23rd and Lithuania ranks 24th of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 3 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5838 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2001 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9727 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0918 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Japan |
| 2010s | 1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Japan |
| 2020s | 1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2288 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Japan or Lithuania?
- Japan, at 1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Japan and Lithuania?
- 0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Lithuania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Lithuania rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Japan ranks 23rd and Lithuania ranks 24th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.