Israel vs Monaco: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Israel
- Monaco
How they compare
Israel currently reports 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Monaco, a difference of 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Monaco ahead.
Israel ranks 29th and Monaco ranks 30th of 204 countries.
Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1528 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Monaco |
| 2020s | 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1692 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Monaco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Israel or Monaco?
- Israel, at 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Monaco as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Israel and Monaco?
- 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Monaco?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Israel and Monaco rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Israel ranks 29th and Monaco ranks 30th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.