Hungary vs Rwanda: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Hungary
- Rwanda
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 0.2638 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2546 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0092 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 27 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 75th and Rwanda ranks 76th of 206 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.6556 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.61 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
| 2000s | 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.96 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
| 2010s | 0.6814 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0013 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.68 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
| 2020s | 0.3647 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1872 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1775 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Hungary or Rwanda?
- Hungary, at 0.2638 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2546 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Rwanda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Hungary and Rwanda?
- 0.0092 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Rwanda?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Hungary and Rwanda rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Hungary ranks 75th and Rwanda ranks 76th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.