Hong Kong vs Netherlands: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate

Hong Kong
1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Netherlands
1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Hong Kong rank
8th
Netherlands rank
10th

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Netherlands
00.511.52199620102024

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Netherlands ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 8th and Netherlands ranks 10th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 3 and Netherlands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Netherlands Difference Ahead
1990s 1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.67 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2942 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Netherlands
2000s 2.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.91 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1088 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Hong Kong
2010s 2.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.81 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2496 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Hong Kong
2020s 1.76 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.75 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.008 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Hong Kong or Netherlands?
Hong Kong, at 1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Netherlands as of 2024.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Hong Kong and Netherlands?
0.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Netherlands?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong and Netherlands rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Hong Kong ranks 8th and Netherlands ranks 10th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Netherlands: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/hong-kong-sar-china/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/hong-kong-sar-china/netherlands/">Hong Kong vs Netherlands: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,143 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.