Hong Kong vs Monaco: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Hong Kong
- Monaco
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 1.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Monaco, a difference of 0.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 9th and Monaco ranks 12th of 206 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7908 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 1.7 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3678 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Hong Kong or Monaco?
- Hong Kong, at 1.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Monaco as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Hong Kong and Monaco?
- 0.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Monaco?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do Hong Kong and Monaco rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Hong Kong ranks 9th and Monaco ranks 12th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.