Georgia vs Saudi Arabia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Georgia
0.6234 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Saudi Arabia
0.6695 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Georgia rank
49th
Saudi Arabia rank
46th

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Georgia
  • Saudi Arabia
-1-0.500.51199620102025

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 0.6695 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6234 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Georgia, a difference of 0.0461 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Georgia ranks 49th and Saudi Arabia ranks 46th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Saudi Arabia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1990s -0.9131 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2738 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6393 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Saudi Arabia
2000s -0.123 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0258 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0972 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Saudi Arabia
2010s 0.8465 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6665 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Georgia
2020s 0.7901 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4631 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.327 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Georgia or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 0.6695 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6234 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Georgia as of 2025.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Georgia and Saudi Arabia?
0.0461 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Saudi Arabia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Georgia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Georgia ranks 49th and Saudi Arabia ranks 46th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Saudi Arabia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/georgia/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/georgia/saudi-arabia/">Georgia vs Saudi Arabia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,391 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.