Georgia vs Malaysia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Georgia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 0.6805 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Georgia, a difference of 0.0305 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Malaysia ahead.
Georgia ranks 50th and Malaysia ranks 48th of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Malaysia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.9338 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4261 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Malaysia |
| 2000s | -0.1417 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5942 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7359 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 0.7977 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7422 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0554 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0.7762 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6584 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1178 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Georgia or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 0.6805 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Georgia and Malaysia?
- 0.0305 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Malaysia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Malaysia rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Georgia ranks 50th and Malaysia ranks 48th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.