Gabon vs East Timor: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Gabon
- East Timor
How they compare
Gabon currently reports -0.7235 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7342 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in East Timor, a difference of 0.0107 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Gabon ahead.
Gabon ranks 153rd and East Timor ranks 155th of 204 countries.
Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.4272 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8394 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Gabon |
| 2010s | -0.6325 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3271 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Gabon |
| 2020s | -0.7912 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8179 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0267 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Gabon or East Timor?
- Gabon, at -0.7235 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7342 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in East Timor as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Gabon and East Timor?
- 0.0107 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and East Timor?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Gabon and East Timor rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Gabon ranks 153rd and East Timor ranks 155th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.