Eritrea vs South Sudan: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Eritrea
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports -1.93 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -2.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Eritrea, a difference of 0.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 14 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 204th and South Sudan ranks 202nd of 204 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -1.91 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.69 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2217 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | South Sudan |
| 2020s | -2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.95 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0495 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Eritrea or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at -1.93 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -2.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Eritrea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Eritrea and South Sudan?
- 0.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and South Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and South Sudan rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Eritrea ranks 204th and South Sudan ranks 202nd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.