El Salvador vs Tonga: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- El Salvador
- Tonga
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports -0.1762 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1945 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tonga, a difference of 0.0183 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 108th and Tonga ranks 109th of 204 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.3788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7009 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 0.1546 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3182 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4728 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | El Salvador |
| 2020s | -0.2491 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2736 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0245 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, El Salvador or Tonga?
- El Salvador, at -0.1762 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1945 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tonga as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between El Salvador and Tonga?
- 0.0183 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Tonga?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Tonga rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- El Salvador ranks 108th and Tonga ranks 109th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.