El Salvador vs India: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

El Salvador
-0.1415 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
India
-0.1696 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
El Salvador rank
107th
India rank
109th

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • El Salvador
  • India
-0.5-0.2500.250.5199620102025

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports -0.1415 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1696 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in India, a difference of 0.0281 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 107th and India ranks 109th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 3 and India in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador India Difference Ahead
1990s -0.1358 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5773 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4415 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador
2000s 0.2339 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3255 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5594 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador
2010s 0.2067 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3083 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.515 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador
2020s -0.1756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1392 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0364 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, El Salvador or India?
El Salvador, at -0.1415 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1696 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in India as of 2025.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between El Salvador and India?
0.0281 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and India?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do El Salvador and India rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
El Salvador ranks 107th and India ranks 109th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs India: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/el-salvador/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/el-salvador/india/">El Salvador vs India: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,391 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.