Egypt vs Zambia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Egypt
-0.4592 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Zambia
-0.4536 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Egypt rank
134th
Zambia rank
133rd

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Egypt
  • Zambia
-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2-0199620102025

How they compare

Zambia currently reports -0.4536 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4592 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Egypt, a difference of 0.0056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 134th and Zambia ranks 133rd of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s -0.3214 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4941 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1727 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Egypt
2000s -0.3233 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6064 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Egypt
2010s -0.5452 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4715 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0737 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Zambia
2020s -0.5374 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4707 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0667 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Egypt or Zambia?
Zambia, at -0.4536 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4592 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Egypt as of 2025.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Egypt and Zambia?
0.0056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Zambia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Egypt and Zambia rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Egypt ranks 134th and Zambia ranks 133rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Zambia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/egypt-arab-rep/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/egypt-arab-rep/zambia/">Egypt vs Zambia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,391 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.