Croatia vs Rwanda: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Croatia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0.2859 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2696 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0163 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 71st and Rwanda ranks 73rd of 204 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.3192 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.58 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Croatia |
| 2000s | 0.2628 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7459 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0.2542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0155 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2387 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0.3125 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1866 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1259 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Croatia or Rwanda?
- Croatia, at 0.2859 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2696 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Croatia and Rwanda?
- 0.0163 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Rwanda?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Rwanda rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Croatia ranks 71st and Rwanda ranks 73rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.