Croatia vs North Macedonia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Croatia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0.2859 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2663 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.0196 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 71st and North Macedonia ranks 74th of 204 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.3192 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5701 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2509 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Croatia |
| 2000s | 0.2628 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0957 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3586 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0.2542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1915 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0628 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0.3125 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2435 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Croatia or North Macedonia?
- Croatia, at 0.2859 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2663 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Croatia and North Macedonia?
- 0.0196 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and North Macedonia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and North Macedonia rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Croatia ranks 71st and North Macedonia ranks 74th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.