Croatia vs North Macedonia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Croatia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 0.4543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.435 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Croatia, a difference of 0.0193 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 59th and North Macedonia ranks 57th of 206 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.3067 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5141 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2073 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Croatia |
| 2000s | 0.2711 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0666 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3376 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0.2842 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2033 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0809 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0.3632 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3506 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0125 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Croatia or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 0.4543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.435 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Croatia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Croatia and North Macedonia?
- 0.0193 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and North Macedonia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and North Macedonia rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Croatia ranks 59th and North Macedonia ranks 57th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.