Côte d'Ivoire vs Tonga: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate

Côte d'Ivoire
-0.167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Tonga
-0.1945 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Côte d'Ivoire rank
107th
Tonga rank
109th

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time

  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • Tonga
-1.2-1-0.75-0.5-0.25199620102024

How they compare

Côte d'Ivoire currently reports -0.167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1945 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tonga, a difference of 0.0275 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Tonga ahead.

Côte d'Ivoire ranks 107th and Tonga ranks 109th of 204 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Côte d'Ivoire Tonga Difference Ahead
2000s -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7009 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3064 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Tonga
2010s -0.5861 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3182 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2679 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Tonga
2020s -0.2363 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2736 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0373 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Côte d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Côte d'Ivoire or Tonga?
Côte d'Ivoire, at -0.167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1945 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tonga as of 2024.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Côte d'Ivoire and Tonga?
0.0275 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Tonga?
21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Côte d'Ivoire and Tonga rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 107th and Tonga ranks 109th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Côte d'Ivoire vs Tonga: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/cote-d-ivoire/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/cote-d-ivoire/tonga/">Côte d'Ivoire vs Tonga: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,143 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.