Cameroon vs East Timor: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Cameroon
- East Timor
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports -0.7287 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7342 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in East Timor, a difference of 0.0055 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Cameroon has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 154th and East Timor ranks 155th of 204 countries.
Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.8479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cameroon |
| 2010s | -0.8007 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.159 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cameroon |
| 2020s | -0.7572 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8179 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Cameroon or East Timor?
- Cameroon, at -0.7287 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7342 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in East Timor as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Cameroon and East Timor?
- 0.0055 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and East Timor?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Cameroon and East Timor rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Cameroon ranks 154th and East Timor ranks 155th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.