Cameroon vs Marshall Islands: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Cameroon
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports -0.6876 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7287 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cameroon, a difference of 0.0411 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Cameroon ranks 154th and Marshall Islands ranks 152nd of 204 countries.
Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.7509 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8652 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1143 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cameroon |
| 2010s | -0.8007 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9339 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1333 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cameroon |
| 2020s | -0.7572 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8616 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1044 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Cameroon or Marshall Islands?
- Marshall Islands, at -0.6876 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7287 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cameroon as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Cameroon and Marshall Islands?
- 0.0411 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Marshall Islands?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Cameroon and Marshall Islands rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Cameroon ranks 154th and Marshall Islands ranks 152nd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.