Cambodia vs Malawi: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Cambodia
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports -0.585 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.6314 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cambodia, a difference of 0.0464 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Cambodia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 146th and Malawi ranks 143rd of 204 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.3417 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3628 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0211 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cambodia |
| 2000s | -0.4006 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5624 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1619 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cambodia |
| 2010s | -0.5736 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0861 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cambodia |
| 2020s | -0.6775 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6779 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0004 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Cambodia or Malawi?
- Malawi, at -0.585 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.6314 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cambodia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Cambodia and Malawi?
- 0.0464 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Malawi?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Cambodia and Malawi rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Cambodia ranks 146th and Malawi ranks 143rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.