Burkina Faso vs Nepal: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate

Burkina Faso
-0.5256 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Nepal
-0.5523 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
139th
Nepal rank
142nd

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Nepal
-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2199620102024

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports -0.5256 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5523 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Nepal, a difference of 0.0267 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Nepal ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 139th and Nepal ranks 142nd of 204 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Nepal Difference Ahead
1990s -0.5086 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6278 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1192 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Burkina Faso
2000s -0.367 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.615 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Burkina Faso
2010s -0.3367 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7135 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3769 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Burkina Faso
2020s -0.4927 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6116 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1188 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Burkina Faso or Nepal?
Burkina Faso, at -0.5256 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5523 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Nepal as of 2024.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Burkina Faso and Nepal?
0.0267 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Nepal?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Burkina Faso and Nepal rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Burkina Faso ranks 139th and Nepal ranks 142nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Nepal: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/burkina-faso/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/burkina-faso/nepal/">Burkina Faso vs Nepal: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,143 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.