Burkina Faso vs Naoero: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Burkina Faso
- Naoero
How they compare
Naoero currently reports -0.5245 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5256 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.0011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 139th and Naoero ranks 138th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Naoero in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Naoero | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.2616 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7384 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4768 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | -0.3367 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6517 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.315 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | -0.4927 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0604 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Burkina Faso or Naoero?
- Naoero, at -0.5245 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5256 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Burkina Faso as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Burkina Faso and Naoero?
- 0.0011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Naoero?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Naoero rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Burkina Faso ranks 139th and Naoero ranks 138th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.