Brunei vs San Marino: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Brunei
- San Marino
How they compare
Brunei currently reports 0.963 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8501 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in San Marino, a difference of 0.1129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Brunei's figure about 1.1 times San Marino's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Brunei ahead.
Brunei ranks 37th and San Marino ranks 40th of 206 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brunei averaged higher in 1 and San Marino in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.856 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8642 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0082 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | San Marino |
| 2020s | 0.9395 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.857 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0826 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Brunei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Brunei or San Marino?
- Brunei, at 0.963 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8501 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in San Marino as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Brunei and San Marino?
- 0.1129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Brunei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and San Marino?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do Brunei and San Marino rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Brunei ranks 37th and San Marino ranks 40th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.