Brazil vs Sri Lanka: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate

Brazil
-0.2945 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Sri Lanka
-0.2992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Brazil rank
119th
Sri Lanka rank
120th

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time

  • Brazil
  • Sri Lanka
-0.4-0.2-00.2199620102024

How they compare

Brazil currently reports -0.2945 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0047 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 119th and Sri Lanka ranks 120th of 204 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s -0.0189 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1858 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1669 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Brazil
2000s 0.0845 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1027 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1872 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Brazil
2010s 0.0019 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0637 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0655 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Brazil
2020s -0.2065 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2823 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0758 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Brazil or Sri Lanka?
Brazil, at -0.2945 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Brazil and Sri Lanka?
0.0047 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sri Lanka?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Brazil and Sri Lanka rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Brazil ranks 119th and Sri Lanka ranks 120th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Sri Lanka: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/brazil/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/brazil/sri-lanka/">Brazil vs Sri Lanka: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,143 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.