Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kenya: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate

Bosnia and Herzegovina
-0.3498 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Kenya
-0.3336 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
126th
Kenya rank
125th

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Kenya
-1.2-1-0.75-0.5-0.25199620102024

How they compare

Kenya currently reports -0.3336 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3498 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.0162 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Kenya ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 126th and Kenya ranks 125th of 205 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Kenya in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Kenya Difference Ahead
1990s -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5975 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6582 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Kenya
2000s -0.4317 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3687 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.063 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Kenya
2010s -0.2461 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3578 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1117 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s -0.3662 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0354 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Kenya?
Kenya, at -0.3336 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3498 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kenya?
0.0162 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kenya?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kenya rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 126th and Kenya ranks 125th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kenya: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bosnia-and-herzegovina/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bosnia-and-herzegovina/kenya/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kenya: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 5,160 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.