Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Guinea-Bissau: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate

Bolivia, Plurinational State of
-1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau
-1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
186th
Guinea-Bissau rank
183rd

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time

  • Bolivia, Plurinational State of
  • Guinea-Bissau
-1.5-1-0.50199620102024

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports -1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, a difference of 0.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.

Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 186th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 183rd of 204 countries.

Bolivia, Plurinational State of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia, Plurinational State of Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1354 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.48 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bolivia, Plurinational State of
2000s -0.4186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7182 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bolivia, Plurinational State of
2010s -0.8522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3961 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bolivia, Plurinational State of
2020s -1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1267 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bolivia, Plurinational State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at -1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bolivia, Plurinational State of as of 2024.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Guinea-Bissau?
0.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Guinea-Bissau?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 186th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 183rd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Guinea-Bissau: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bolivia/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bolivia/guinea-bissau/">Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Guinea-Bissau: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,143 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.