Belize vs Nauru: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Belize
- Nauru
How they compare
Belize currently reports -0.5471 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5761 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Nauru, a difference of 0.029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 140th and Nauru ranks 141st of 206 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 2 and Nauru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.2988 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4281 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Belize |
| 2010s | -0.446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6381 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1921 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Belize |
| 2020s | -0.5506 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4631 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0875 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Belize or Nauru?
- Belize, at -0.5471 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5761 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Nauru as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Belize and Nauru?
- 0.029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Nauru?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
- How do Belize and Nauru rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Belize ranks 140th and Nauru ranks 141st of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.