Barbados vs Slovak Republic: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate

Barbados
0.4405 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Slovak Republic
0.4047 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Barbados rank
61st
Slovak Republic rank
62nd

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time

  • Barbados
  • Slovak Republic
00.511.5199620102024

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.4405 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4047 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Slovak Republic, a difference of 0.0358 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Slovak Republic's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 61st and Slovak Republic ranks 62nd of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and Slovak Republic in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Slovak Republic Difference Ahead
1990s 1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1628 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Barbados
2000s 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9824 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.135 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Barbados
2010s 0.5473 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8222 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2749 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovak Republic
2020s 0.4303 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6038 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1735 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovak Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Barbados or Slovak Republic?
Barbados, at 0.4405 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4047 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Slovak Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Barbados and Slovak Republic?
0.0358 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Slovak Republic?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Barbados and Slovak Republic rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Barbados ranks 61st and Slovak Republic ranks 62nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Slovak Republic: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/barbados/slovak-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/barbados/slovak-republic/">Barbados vs Slovak Republic: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,143 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.