Bangladesh vs Sao Tome and Principe: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate

Bangladesh
-0.9501 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
-0.8909 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
175th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
172nd

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Sao Tome and Principe
-1.2-1-0.8-0.6-0.4199620102024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports -0.8909 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.9501 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.0592 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 175th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 172nd of 205 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6985 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4566 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Sao Tome and Principe
2000s -0.9876 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6973 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2903 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Sao Tome and Principe
2010s -0.8443 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7821 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0622 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Sao Tome and Principe
2020s -0.9081 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8487 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0594 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Bangladesh or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at -0.8909 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.9501 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bangladesh as of 2024.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Bangladesh and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0592 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Sao Tome and Principe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Bangladesh and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Bangladesh ranks 175th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 172nd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Sao Tome and Principe: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bangladesh/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bangladesh/sao-tome-and-principe/">Bangladesh vs Sao Tome and Principe: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 5,160 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.