Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Thailand: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate

Azerbaijan, Republic of
0.1349 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Thailand
0.1064 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Azerbaijan, Republic of rank
80th
Thailand rank
83rd

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time

  • Azerbaijan, Republic of
  • Thailand
-1.5-1-0.500.5199620102024

How they compare

Azerbaijan, Republic of currently reports 0.1349 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1064 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Thailand, a difference of 0.0285 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Azerbaijan, Republic of's figure about 1.3 times Thailand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Thailand ahead.

Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 80th and Thailand ranks 83rd of 204 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan, Republic of Thailand Difference Ahead
1990s -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0908 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Thailand
2000s -0.5657 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2148 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7805 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Thailand
2010s -0.3031 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1552 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4583 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Thailand
2020s -0.0095 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1151 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Azerbaijan, Republic of or Thailand?
Azerbaijan, Republic of, at 0.1349 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1064 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Thailand as of 2024.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Azerbaijan, Republic of and Thailand?
0.0285 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Azerbaijan, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan, Republic of and Thailand?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Azerbaijan, Republic of and Thailand rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 80th and Thailand ranks 83rd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Thailand: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/azerbaijan/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/azerbaijan/thailand/">Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Thailand: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,143 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.