Aruba vs Qatar: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Aruba
- Qatar
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.9809 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9663 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Qatar, a difference of 0.0146 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 35th and Qatar ranks 36th of 204 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4396 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6705 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5191 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0.9815 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8955 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.086 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Aruba or Qatar?
- Aruba, at 0.9809 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9663 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Qatar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Aruba and Qatar?
- 0.0146 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Qatar?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Qatar rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Aruba ranks 35th and Qatar ranks 36th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.