Aruba vs Latvia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Aruba
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9809 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Aruba, a difference of 0.1191 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Latvia ahead.
Aruba ranks 35th and Latvia ranks 32nd of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.999 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1112 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3127 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0.9815 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0465 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Aruba or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9809 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Aruba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Aruba and Latvia?
- 0.1191 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Latvia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Latvia rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Aruba ranks 35th and Latvia ranks 32nd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.