Armenia vs North Macedonia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate

Armenia
0.138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
North Macedonia
0.2663 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Armenia rank
77th
North Macedonia rank
74th

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time

  • Armenia
  • North Macedonia
-0.75-0.5-0.2500.250.5199620102024

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 0.2663 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Armenia, a difference of 0.1283 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.9 times Armenia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Armenia ranks 77th and North Macedonia ranks 74th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s -0.7787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5701 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 North Macedonia
2000s 0.1072 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0957 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Armenia
2010s 0.2896 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1915 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0981 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Armenia
2020s 0.1436 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2435 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0999 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Armenia or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 0.2663 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Armenia as of 2024.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Armenia and North Macedonia?
0.1283 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and North Macedonia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Armenia and North Macedonia rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Armenia ranks 77th and North Macedonia ranks 74th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs North Macedonia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/armenia/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/armenia/north-macedonia/">Armenia vs North Macedonia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,143 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.