Armenia vs Montenegro: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Armenia
- Montenegro
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0.2177 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2093 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.0084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 78th and Montenegro ranks 79th of 206 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.3548 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1086 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4634 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Armenia |
| 2010s | 0.3046 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1836 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1211 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Armenia |
| 2020s | 0.1788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2554 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0765 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Armenia or Montenegro?
- Armenia, at 0.2177 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2093 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Montenegro as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Armenia and Montenegro?
- 0.0084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Montenegro?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Armenia and Montenegro rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Armenia ranks 78th and Montenegro ranks 79th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.