Argentina vs Kosovo: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Argentina
- Kosovo
How they compare
Kosovo currently reports -0.2229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.235 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Argentina, a difference of 0.0121 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Kosovo ahead.
Argentina ranks 114th and Kosovo ranks 113th of 204 countries.
Kosovo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.7216 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.278 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4436 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kosovo |
| 2010s | -0.5964 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2886 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kosovo |
| 2020s | -0.4904 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3691 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1213 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Argentina or Kosovo?
- Kosovo, at -0.2229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.235 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Argentina as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Argentina and Kosovo?
- 0.0121 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kosovo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kosovo?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Argentina and Kosovo rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Argentina ranks 114th and Kosovo ranks 113th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.