Angola vs East Timor: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Angola
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports -0.7324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7439 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Angola, a difference of 0.0115 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was East Timor ahead.
Angola ranks 159th and East Timor ranks 158th of 206 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0469 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | East Timor |
| 2010s | -1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9381 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1026 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | East Timor |
| 2020s | -0.8395 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8102 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0293 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Angola or East Timor?
- East Timor, at -0.7324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7439 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Angola as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Angola and East Timor?
- 0.0115 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and East Timor?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
- How do Angola and East Timor rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Angola ranks 159th and East Timor ranks 158th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.